triadafirm.blogg.se - Lies of p abap

Thereby creating duplication of data and reconciliation issues. The costing-based method continues to keep its separate data model in SAP S/4 HANA. With more insights available regarding COGS and production variances, account-based CO-PA is no longer the poor cousin to the costing-based method. Thus, this change is a major shift in the process, design, configuration and management side. Since, for a long time, SAP customers have only used the costing-based method. Importantly, Universal Journal is the foundation of SAP S/4 HANA. Universal Journal in SAP COPAĪccount-based CO-PA is built on the Universal Journal and underlying table ACDOCA. Still, I want you to find out which one you prefer by seeing the following differences 1. As I mentioned earlier, the account-based method is preferred for CO-PA under SAP S/4 HANA. This topic is a key area of consideration for many SAP customers. Learn SAP CO-PA in S4 HANA Finance Training Costing-Based COPA vs. Once your business gets comfortable with the Account-based CO-PA, you may deactivate the Costing-based CO-PA. So you may want to retain costing-based CO-PA for a certain period. Since it is not possible to migrate the history from costing-based CO-PA to account-based CO-PA. However, you should activate account-based CO-PA as well.

So, if you are using costing-based CO-PA and are migrating to SAP S/4 HANA Management Accounting, you can continue to use it.

It does so by creating two versions of profitability that lead to the same old reconciliation issues experienced with SAP ERP. Costing-Based CO-PAĬosting-based CO-PA in SAP compromises the principle of a single version of the truth in finance. Ledger Approach in SAP New Asset Accounting 2. This is to say, you can activate both costing and account-based CO-PA at the same time by checking the checkbox.Īlso read: Accounting Vs.

You can use it along with costing-based CO-PA.

Account-based COPA has easier reconciliation with the general ledger because you can look at the values in both modules using the same object (GL account).

As the latter involves the mapping of condition types, cost elements, variance as so on to value fields.

It takes much less time than configuring costing-based COPA.

It is easy to set up than costing based COPA.

The advantage is that it is easier to reconcile to the general ledger as there is no mapping involved. Account-Based COPAĪccount-Based COPA is simplifying COPA by accounts rather than value fields (used in Costing based CO-PA). So, now let us understand each of them separately and additionally know the key difference between both of them.

However, we need to know why Account-Based CO-PA carries more value than Costing-based COPA in SAP S/4HANA Finance. There are two types of Profitability Analysis in Controlling in S/4HANA Finance.Īlthough both of them have their importance. Related Article: Learn the COPA Process Flow in SAP ECC (FICO) Types of SAP COPA in S/4HANA Finance It further improves the end-user experience, real-time close etc. The transformational changes include the usage of the Universal Journal and the elimination of reconciliation. SAP S/4 HANA caused a standard shift on how customers would use and benefit from CO-PA in Future. These accelerators showed how performance in CO-PA planning, allocations and reporting processes would improve when it runs on SAP HANA.īefore SAP introduced HANA, Business Warehouse (SAP BW)was the most preferred analytical solution for CO-PA reporting. In SAP S4 HANA, one of the earliest innovations in CO-PA was through CO-PA Accelerators. Region ( Region wise profitability- East, North).Key Reporting Dimensions where SAP COPA benefits you